HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
No, I have not. Wouldn't > 3X OW be pretty unusual? {nm}
No, and, The secret sauce is secret. {nm} Oct 25, 13:13
That's actually backasswards, Oct 25, 13:50
What Evidence led you to that Conclusion? {nm} Oct 25, 13:55
Killers stock rising at a time it would be difficult to understand anyone buying and not shorting it. {nm} Oct 26, 06:08
All that means is that the BUY & COVER Transactions were Greater than the SELL & SHORT Transactions. {nm} Oct 26, 06:31
Which makes no rational sense, hence my confusion. {nm} Oct 26, 08:17
The flaw in your assumptions is that the trading is entirely rational. {nm} Oct 26, 12:47
Fair point. {nm} Oct 27, 07:13
Traders COVERING (KOTFM) SHORTS to Invest more Profitably Elsewhere would Cause (KOTFM) to Rise. Very little Trading Volume. Oct 26, 13:16
There are other ways to make rational sense, when a movie like KOTFM doesn't fit the most common mold. {nm} Oct 26, 14:56
** This post has been removed by the forum moderator! ** Oct 27, 13:16
No Need to TAG. Monday, Tuesday & Wednesday are not Reported as (TSWIF) does not have (TSTET) on M-T-W. {nm} Oct 27, 15:19
The Number of Shares Held LONG & the Number of Shares Held SHORT do not Affect Price Movement. {nm} Oct 25, 16:48
Only BUY / SELL / SHORT / COVER Transactions Affect Price Movement. Please show us an Example of your Conclusion. {nm} Oct 25, 16:49
Not a conclusion, a question. That was the only way for me to make sense that Killers keeps rising with OW of $23M {nm} Oct 26, 06:36
You may have much yet to learn. Not all movies have the same attendance profile. {nm} Oct 26, 14:48
Have you researched the attendance patterns of other Scorsese movies? {nm} Oct 26, 15:02
No, I have not. Wouldn't > 3X OW be pretty unusual? Oct 27, 07:14
Scorsese is unusual. {nm} Oct 27, 22:22
It's a Scorsese SMACK-DOWN. {nm} Oct 29, 09:44
Oh, now this was Unusual - (KOTFM) TUES 24OCT23 2.90 MILL was Greater than (KOTFM) FRI 27OCT23 2.67 MILL. SMACK-DOWN Ahead. Oct 30, 18:53