And how is this not news? And what if it is or isn't? YOU made me WATCH THE STUPID video just because of YOUR post so I could see what was soooo unworthy. And the vid does nothing for me...but I am a jaded movie theater manager who doesn't care about this stuff. BUT, people who like MOVIES play this game and may want to see the Entertainment Tonight type of story that interviews actors and is like a DVD extra.
As far as Equal Time, sheesh, I have gone around the wheel as far as who I post from. At one time, you could have accused me of working for ComingSoon...then IESB...then maybe Latino Review...then maybe MTV...I have posted from all of them in a concentrated manner in the 2 and a half years of posting news. I have rarely gone to MovieWeb or Collider and they do break news on occaision. If I were rabidly pursuing gains, I would be checking them.
Groundbreaking or newsworthy? Not to me...I have seen interviews like this before and if it isn't about a movie I am interested in, I won't read it. But there are fans of this particular movie/genre that might just want to know about it and read it. I don't think articles like this are going to get censored.
Do I post these interviews and stuff? Usually no, not what I am looking for or reading. Do I immediately go out and buy a stock when stories like this are posted? No. Are newbies unduly influenced to buy stocks because of stories like this? Not my problem. I don't go out and buy stocks based on the "What did you see this week?" posts or every post about a new one-sheet either.
So, are you going to tag me with that, "Oh you MIRC jerks all stick together" mantra? Cause whether you posted this about anyone that using MIRC or just some new or old trader starting to post news, I would still reply. I think your comment is out of line. If you think grammar is the Collider/MovieWeb rep, well MAYBE YOU OUGHT TO FILL THE GAP AND POST FOR THE UNDER-REPRESENTED SITES instead of ****ing about it. You could post it right under grammar's post and let the people choose which one they want to click on or all of them. THEN, holy smokes! Then your point of "everyone gets these interviews" would be made and then traders would have a better idea of how to react to posts IF they even react at all and they could choose which site does the best interviews or if looking at one means they do not have to look at all the other posts.