HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
i have never seen a movie make less than a million per 1,000 want to sees. So if this gets to 40k by friday 40mm would bd the floor {nm}
mtc cow 41 smurf 20 crazy 14 {nm} Jul 25, 11:35
Ouch for CSL. {nm} Jul 25, 11:38
double ouch {nm} Jul 25, 11:39
The question is .... what went wrong with the film's marketing? {nm} Jul 25, 11:41
yeah, that is a bad joke. {nm} Jul 25, 11:47
indeed it is, but I want to see that movie, even if it's just because of Emma Stone {nm} Jul 25, 13:07
do you have a suggestion? the trailers did it for me just fine. {nm} Jul 25, 11:47
Sorry. I really can't figure out, and I am surprised by the film's bad tracking {nm} Jul 25, 11:54
The trailer wasn't great for me and didn't get any noticeable reactions from what I saw {nm} Jul 25, 12:34
Emma Stone overexposure (FwB, this, and the already being marketed THELP), no real plot given (seems like vignettes) {nm} Jul 25, 13:04
I know you loathe her, but she wasn't marketed that much in relation to FWBFT {nm} Jul 25, 17:11
yeah trailer looked campy to me. too old-fashioned {nm} Jul 25, 15:17
it looks like crap. {nm} Jul 25, 16:27
rs and mtc both too low for C vs. A, rotten tomatoes "want to sees" alrrady 36k and reviews 80% (4/5) {nm} Jul 25, 11:49
Even BO has C vs A at 36. {nm} Jul 25, 11:54
What was the "want to sees" count for other recent openers? {nm} Jul 25, 12:20
i have never seen a movie make less than a million per 1,000 want to sees. So if this gets to 40k by friday 40mm would bd the floor Jul 25, 12:33
It does indeed seem to mirror current tracking pretty closely. Jul 25, 14:06
all the limiteds kill his theory {nm} Jul 25, 14:41
I don't trust anyone who calls themselves a Moron to be one either lol {nm} Jul 25, 15:39
Oh, huge dissapointment! Jul 25, 12:22
MTC tagging [CSLOV] [SMURF] [CBALN] {nm} Jul 25, 15:19