it's at least worth testing from here on out. {nm} Jul 29, 17:47
As of Friday evening, the RT numbers are 40-24-17. Soooo... a little low on SMURF, otherwise not bad. Jul 29, 17:51
yes, but if they represented minimums that would be impressive and very useful. interesting read indeed. {nm} Jul 29, 17:53
Paul Dirac, who developed the "Large Numbers Hypothesis." {nm} Jul 29, 18:12
impressive stuff. i am big into mathematics/numbers but this is well above me... Jul 29, 18:27
very nice. many of you guys use much better data than what I use. {nm} Jul 29, 18:25
Well I'm this guy that is very anti-technology (which is weird if you knew what I do for a living). Jul 29, 18:46
TFRM3 is at 60,137 user reviews...but it was at the same number days before its release. Jul 29, 18:19
Flixster has had issues with updating some totals, which make some comparisons difficult unfortunately. {nm} Jul 29, 18:22
true. this week it just really worked out well. i always look at those numbers but never calculated them that way before. {nm} Jul 29, 18:23
I would be interested to look upon them if you do. {nm} Jul 29, 18:51
Great. I think it should be a more accurate indicator than twitter if a good database were collected, less noise in the data Jul 29, 19:17
What rankings/numbers are you using from Flixster? The want to see numbers? The ratings once it opens? {nm} Jul 29, 21:30