HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
Which is lamer: owning REAL stock in a studio that DOESN'T decide to make $20M+ by rereleasing a classic in 3D, or only owning HSX stocks? {nm}
Which is lamer: The rerelease of old movies in "3D" or HSX releasing movie stocks around them? {nm} Mar 03, 06:37
To be fair, HSX is only releasing those movie stocks because the studios are re-releasing those lame 3D movies {nm} Mar 03, 06:39
I say they should ignore them altogether. HSX doesn't recognize the starbonds in the movie so why recognize the movie? {nm} Mar 03, 06:41
Because ignoring a movie that makes $30 million OW would be stupid. {nm} Mar 03, 06:46
How would ignoring movies in the top 5, making 20M+ over a weekend, make any sense for HSX? {nm} Mar 03, 06:47
They ignore films in the top 5 making 20mil + all the time Mar 03, 06:56
Um, fine. OPENING weekend then. Mar 03, 07:00
fair point, especially the warrants {nm} Mar 03, 07:11
If by "all the time" you mean 3 times in the last 13 years (and once in the last decade :) Mar 03, 10:06
Because HSX wants to be comprehensive and covers all movies released in north US for the benefit of all traders ;) {nm} Mar 03, 06:58
What about B.O. sales in the Confederacy? ;) {nm} Mar 03, 07:48
I think it's because HSX sells the data to buyers who want to know how those movies might do. {nm} Mar 03, 09:01
Which is lamer: owning REAL stock in a studio that DOESN'T decide to make $20M+ by rereleasing a classic in 3D, or only owning HSX stocks? Mar 03, 06:58
Feeling of deja vu. Didn't we have this discussion just a few months ago? {nm} Mar 03, 12:51