Why would Murdoch fund it? {nm} Jul 05, 15:50
he sent out a tweet a few days ago that was interpreted by some press watchers as directing his reporters to attack {nm} Jul 05, 15:58
Attack who? {nm} Jul 05, 16:04
I just looked it up...Calling it a cult and creepy certainly doesn't add up to a "call to arms" in my book {nm} Jul 05, 16:06
well, given the amount of media he owns, it was interpreted that way by some media watchers; I never saw the tweet myself {nm} Jul 05, 16:26
Link inside. While not an overt "call to arms", it states his opinion clearly. His employees took note, I'm sure. Jul 05, 17:18
interesting; I just found this one that says Scientologists (Cruise specifically) had tried to woo over one of his sons Jul 05, 17:39
I would trust Scientology more than I would trust Murdoch. {nm} Jul 05, 15:53
Btw, I don't trust Scientology. ;-) {nm} Jul 05, 15:57
You really should re-think that. {nm} Jul 05, 15:58
You trust someone like Murdoch? {nm} Jul 05, 16:10
*last 50-100 years and billions of tax-free dollars {nm} Jul 05, 16:16
100 years? Scientology, not Mormons. It was started by L Ron Hubbard in the 50's. {nm} Jul 05, 16:40
I was referring to the Catholic Church, but left out the name so as to avoid seeming like a baiting troll. {nm} Jul 05, 16:44
Um, didn't get the reference, since Christianity has been around for oh, about 2012 years. ;-) {nm} Jul 05, 16:46
LOL, yeah. {nm} Jul 05, 16:47
*1800, maximum. {nm} Jul 05, 16:51
1983 years, to be exact. The term itself "Christian" was first used as a derogation ~40-50 AD and is recorded by luke. {nm} Jul 05, 16:54
So I take it you don't see any movies released by 20th Century Fox or its subsidiaries? {nm} Jul 05, 16:26
Watching a movie, doesn't really require a whole lot of trust for me. Just entertainment. {nm} Jul 05, 16:49
As opposed to the cult of Christianity? Bigotry is bigotry, friend. Scientology *is* a religion. Jul 05, 16:12
Islam has too yet he doesn't point that out. {nm} Jul 05, 16:20
that would have been a better response than saying Christians haven't committed similar negative acts. Or you can point out Jul 05, 16:26
I haven't finished reading the Koran yet, and I do see protests of crimes commited in the name of Islam. {nm} Jul 05, 16:30
Religion IS a form of government. Technically it's a fascist form, though not in the way that people use that word today. {nm} Jul 05, 16:55
Except for the Spanish Inquistion and the various Crusades. {nm} Jul 05, 16:29
No, that only proves my point. Those were perpetrated by rulers using the name but violated Christianity itself. {nm} Jul 05, 16:32
"Never judge a philosophy by its abuse"-Augustine {nm} Jul 05, 16:35
If they have not been disavowed or excommunicated or whatever the term is, then they are still recognised as Christians. {nm} Jul 05, 16:36
That's a cop out answer. {nm} Jul 05, 16:49
No, it isn't. I repudiate those acts. There is no such thing as an earthly authority to "excommunicate" anyone, that Jul 05, 16:56
According to them, I am "anathema" (damned) because I do not ascribe to their extra and anti biblical teachings. {nm} Jul 05, 16:57
That is ALL Xianity legitimately is, a personal belief. I don't take it personal, I believed as you do until 10 years ago Jul 05, 17:09
There quite simply is no "official" church. {nm} Jul 05, 17:13
Well, they decided on the official Bible. {nm} Jul 05, 17:26
Matthew 27:25 is a call for genocide against my ancestors and myself. {nm} Jul 05, 16:32
You're wrong. Read the context. Jul 05, 16:37
Accountant: you have always been a good person here and a positive influence on the board, I do not mean to insul you, Jul 05, 16:42
Once again though, you're taking that out of its context and subsequently interpreting it incorrectly. Jul 05, 16:54
My point is what you perceive as "leaders and institutions" of Xianity are NOT any such thing, that biblically being a Jul 05, 17:07
No, this is where other people miss the point. Jul 05, 17:08
What he said! {nm} Jul 05, 17:15
+1 {nm} Jul 05, 20:44
it was used as a call for jewish persecution and murder by christians {nm} Jul 05, 16:42
*IS* you are very bad at tenses today, Snob. {nm} Jul 05, 16:44
i meant was. There may be individuals saying that, but not official christian organizations {nm} Jul 05, 16:47
It was MISUSED so. Until 10 years ago I held all the same misconceptions I am answering here, so don't misunderstand me, I Jul 05, 16:51
All of the original Xians were Jewish and were persecuted, not persecutors. {nm} Jul 05, 16:40
OT to an OT thread... Jul 05, 16:44
Thank you!!! {nm} Jul 05, 16:46
If it's a historical record, then why does it have almost every single detail of Jewish law *and* Roman law dead wrong? {nm} Jul 05, 16:47
Check your sources. It does not. Have you read the Dead Sea Scroll translations? Bar Kokhba documents? Jul 05, 17:19
My sources? How 'bout 15 years of formal Jewish education. I think I know a bit about my own culture. {nm} Jul 05, 18:01
Or believe Psychology is a sham as opposed to the science it is {nm} Jul 05, 16:19
Not to mention, no religion is better at taking your money than Scientology {nm} Jul 05, 16:22
In spite of Hollywood portraying it so, Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity. {nm} Jul 05, 16:48
but Roman Catholics ARE christians. you can't have it both ways. {nm} Jul 05, 16:50
SOME individual Roman Catholics are also christians. The institution is NOT. {nm} Jul 05, 17:20
It doesn't take money from individuals just in order to learn more abou the faith. Scientology does {nm} Jul 05, 16:48
Except for the near complete control of the US government. Christianity and Scientology are pretty much totally analogous. Jul 05, 16:53
Don't be glib. {nm} Jul 05, 16:23
Ask Tom Cruise what he thinks about Psychology and get back to me {nm} Jul 05, 16:25
You donât know the history of psychiatry. I do. {nm} Jul 05, 16:31
Why is AIDs only common among the gay community? Maybe they should change their lifestyle if it's so risky. {nm} Jul 05, 16:29
that might be the worst thing you've ever said on these boards, and there's some competition for that {nm} Jul 05, 16:31
Is it not true? You don't see straight people getting AIDs, do you? {nm} Jul 05, 16:33
No, its an offensive lie. AIDS is not "common" among the gay community and heterosexual people get AIDS too. {nm} Jul 05, 16:36
This article by a scholarly paper says otherwise Jul 05, 16:39
Why is it that AIDs rates in hetero males are a lot lower than gay men? Can you answer that truthfully... Jul 05, 17:00
And this logic accounts for the situation in Africa, how? Are all those Africans gay? {nm} Jul 05, 17:05
Oh, hello there White Man's Burden. Didn't see you come in. Did you bring your friend with you, Godwin's Law? {nm} Jul 05, 18:29
Obviously, no. But their situation is different and I wasn't talking about countries in which healthcare is non-existent. {nm} Jul 05, 17:23
You know why it was done too. You said the answer in an earlier post in how Christianity has control of the US gov. Jul 05, 18:15
So...you agree...with...the...(pseudo)-genocide then? I don't even, what? {nm} Jul 05, 18:30
Me thinks he doth protest too much! Jul 05, 21:56
Why should other people be responsible for funding research on something that only happens to those who won't change in spite of known risks Jul 05, 16:32
Arthur Ashe, Magic Johnson, Ray Sharkey, Amanda Blake... {nm} Jul 05, 17:25
The journal article I posted a link to says otherwise. {nm} Jul 05, 16:42
I am a Xian, and this makes me ill, too. no one with AIDS "deserved" it, any more than i do. My role is to care for Jul 05, 17:30
Never said they deserved it, just that living their lifestyle leaves them more prone to get it and they should know that. {nm} Jul 05, 17:58
Really funny how you discuss this on a page admined by a person who used to run ELISA tests :-) Jul 05, 18:35
didn't see *that* coming ... {nm} Jul 05, 17:28
Not anymore, but the priests did use to keep records of confessions, and the Vatican had more than just police. Jul 05, 16:52
Where's AcfJ when you need him? {nm} Jul 05, 16:31
I think after the last argument, he vowed not to post on the forum anymore. {nm} Jul 05, 16:44
He posted on here in his typically respectful and evenhanded manner. {nm} Jul 05, 16:50
Ah this thread is so big I missed his comment above. Of course he would not stay out of this one. {nm} Jul 05, 16:53
He makes a good point above: http://www.hsx.com/forum/forum.php?id=3&pid=189720 {nm} Jul 05, 17:14
Are you not Christian? Do you not believe everything the faith teaches or do you only believe what suits you? {nm} Jul 05, 17:52
Your response also proves that you are only Christian insofar as it suits you. Jul 05, 18:24
Further... Jul 05, 18:41
How is this disproving my point that I stated before that all sin is equal to God? Jul 05, 18:44
Also... Jul 05, 18:53
Yes, but you used inadequate evidence in an ad-hoc manner and didn't specifically state where your comments were coming from. Jul 05, 18:55
And not everyone puts their religion front and center like you do (hence why I didn't at first bring it up) Jul 05, 18:26
A4J: You might enjoy the Jewish corallary for that: Jul 05, 19:27
I personally think there's more to it than that, but at present (but more specifically on here) I'd rather not go into it. Jul 05, 19:41
Precisely my point, RE: Condoms/spilling seed. {nm} Jul 05, 20:53
HERE'S a call to action: stop talking to this guy. He's obviously trolling for arguments. Not worth it. {nm} Jul 05, 17:40
I thought calls to action weren't allowed on here :P {nm} Jul 05, 17:42
I don't think anyone will mind this one, eh? Smart people unite!! {nm} Jul 05, 18:01
+1 {nm} Jul 05, 19:43
people keep arguing over something so stupid as religion, Come on guys, Has anyone seen GOD here? {nm} Jul 05, 22:40
Religion is stupid only to those who haven't found it. {nm} Jul 05, 22:49
Says the one who picks and chooses the parts of Christianity he wants to believe in and supports things it doesn't {nm} Jul 05, 23:10
Show me one thing that I have said in this discussion that supports something that God says is wrong from Scripture. Jul 05, 23:16
Well, Jul 05, 23:34
People will believe in and act how they want. It's not going to teach non-Christians to hate them. {nm} Jul 05, 23:56
Also, Jul 06, 00:04
Sorry about that but... Jul 06, 00:14
*Don't hold all of them* {nm} Jul 05, 23:41
Also, Jul 05, 23:48
So basically you're saying that because God's Word says that we are to hate homosexuality, then we are to hate homosexuals? Jul 05, 23:53
Do you support... Jul 06, 00:00
Does God's Word support it? {nm} Jul 06, 00:01
What do you think? {nm} Jul 06, 00:04
Don't need it. I already know what your answer would be based on what you've already said. {nm} Jul 06, 00:21
Then you'd most probably be flat-out wrong. {nm} Jul 06, 00:22
Not going based on what you've said regarding the subject up to this point. {nm} Jul 06, 00:25
Never said anything to that effect. {nm} Jul 06, 00:30
Get to the logical conclusion: Jul 06, 00:34
Shocking. going to call for my banning now because you don't agree with my religious beliefs? {nm} Jul 05, 22:50
Agreed. Good nite and thank you. Jul 05, 21:54