Box Office Report: Anti-Obama Doc Beats New Films With $6.3 Mil on Eve of GOP Convention
Posted by: MadMok on Aug 26, 12:00
Why is this film not on the exchange- Over 1000 screens and still no love. Yet The Obama Effect at just over $100,000 and 2 theater is listed?
Box Office Report: Anti-Obama Doc Beats New Films With $6.3 Mil on Eve of GOP Convention
MadMok
Aug 26, 12:00
(8th place)
{nm}
mickpix
Aug 26, 12:04
MAKE IT STOP AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
{nm}
ohfirtheloveofmitt
Aug 26, 12:05
Comparable to PRUSH adjustment...oh wait...no...that's right 2016 not list on HSX...anyone else noticed this...
{nm}
Richard In G
Aug 26, 12:14
Yes we have, now stop trolling and get on with your life.
{nm}
stevie1der328
Aug 26, 12:28
Whats the fuss about Obamas aunt is she hot
{nm}
blaze223
Aug 26, 12:22
If you had mentioned the film to DMac before it opened in one theater, it would be on the exchange. I blame traders asking why it is missing
Catzan
Aug 26, 12:41
Again, if the movie didn't perform there would not be a word more about it than what was said in the weeks before its 7/13 premiere in TX.
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:06
Plenty of stocks that don't perform or don't even report. Problem is no one knew about the film until AFTER it opened. No bonds affected
Catzan
Aug 26, 13:12
means it is even lower under the radar. When folks learn of a project, they should email HSX so they are at least aware of project.
Catzan
Aug 26, 13:13
OBEFC IPO'ed the same day that this breakout was released. Traders knew, but 2016 at that time was kind of classified as a fringe film. And,
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:20
And there are two bonds affected by "..Effect". Bonds are an integral part of the game if not a part of the "prediction" half.
Catzan
Aug 26, 13:26
as we know, fringe films financed in the midwest don't get much attention unless they pop in the big cities (NY, LA, y'know, the usual).
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:22
I agree with you Catzan, but I believe traders knew but, the perception was that it would screen and then fall off the radar as these fringe
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:25
Hermano...that would say that not every small pic gets picked up on HSX. No bond implications. =)
Catzan
Aug 26, 13:30
Exactly, and no one is talking how there's a conspiracy against Latinos or Mexicans or somesuch ridiculousness because of that.
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:45
HSX HATES LATINOS!!!
{nm}
dsbman
Aug 26, 13:56
Well, at least until now. :D Leave it to dsbman!
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 14:18
We demand Obama 2016 as iPo
{nm}
mike255
Aug 26, 13:22
This request has fallen on deaf ears. Move on or risk being banned.
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:27
Well, DMac did hear the request, he replied that there was no reasonable way to price the IPO to conform to the purposes of the game.
Catzan
Aug 26, 13:31
10 dollars as iPo for Obama 2016
{nm}
mike255
Aug 26, 13:32
Not realistic. Is that how much the movie will make? Are you sure? So, everyone saw it this weekend? Movie has already made 9m.
Catzan
Aug 26, 13:37
He could make BW warrant to appease whiners but this hardly classifies as a B.
{nm}
thatpj
Aug 26, 13:38
Banned from what and by whom? Precisely where in the HSX Rules is this outlined.
{nm}
RotoHockeyYTD2012
Aug 26, 13:33
Here's a link to the Code of Conduct. It includes "don't post the same message repeatedly". Offenders can be scribbled, or banned outright
Roger More
Aug 26, 13:41
Thanks Roger. Pretty much a basic rule on any forum.
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:46
"Do not post the same message repeatedly (a.k.a. spamming)." This hardly qualifies as spam. ;-)
elchan
Aug 26, 13:47
I'm just responding to the request for the rule to be posted - not commenting on how it's implemented.
Roger More
Aug 26, 14:00
There is no "Hollywood Industrial complex". Stop spreading misinformation for your own personal entertainment
Moviesnob
Aug 26, 14:01
I'm not American, but can you deny that most of the entertainment industry is biased towards the Democrats and against Republicans?
{nm}
elchan
Aug 26, 14:26
thats different than implying there's some shadow relationship between hollywood's corporations and the liberal government
Moviesnob
Aug 26, 14:37
I must disagree. The studio system is in fact an 'industrial complex'. It churns out movies, like the military industrial complex.
elchan
Aug 26, 15:09
All moviegoers are Democrats? Our industry has to appeal to everyone in order to survive. The military industry need only appeal to hawks.
Catzan
Aug 26, 15:20
well...maybe not everyone but to a broad base. =)
Catzan
Aug 26, 15:21
thats barely true, and then they dont have a shared political agenda. Some studios arent even US corporations
{nm}
Moviesnob
Aug 26, 15:24
and its certainly not a "complex" the way Eisenhower used that phrase to describe the relationship between the public and private military
Moviesnob
Aug 26, 15:30
"It's quite evident", he said, citing no evidence.
{nm}
RogerMore
Aug 26, 15:29
Is this where I fall back and cry, "McCarthyism!!!" ;-)
Catzan
Aug 26, 15:47
When, "it's quite evident", usually not specific source is quoted, otherwise one becomes redundant.
elchan
Aug 26, 17:01
http://www.mediaite.com/online/celebrities-you-probably-didnt-know-are-republicans/#6
Catzan
Aug 26, 17:07
Military Industrial Complex doesn't refer to individuals...the equivalent would be studios, not actors...at least to my thinking.
Catzan
Aug 26, 17:09
Industrial complexes are headed by their leaders. In the movie industry, actors like George Clooney would be considered a leader.
{nm}
elchan
Aug 26, 18:09
"Quite Evident" to one person may not be so to others - that's why you explain / site sources so everyone is on the same page
{nm}
JDolphin
Aug 26, 17:38
It's evident that Hollywood leans left. It's not evident what impact that has on American policy-making. It's not evident how that leads to
RogerMore
Aug 26, 19:09
This also implies that HSX has anything to do with Hollywood.
{nm}
Zoggie
Aug 26, 16:27
Antibody has given an answer on the request. His answer should be honored.
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:48
Antibody (DMac as some know him) is the moderator of the boards. He would ban someone. If he posts to stop, one should.
Catzan
Aug 26, 13:45
People have been banned for less. The community has been more than patient with these needless requests to IPO 2016. It will not happen.
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 13:50
Code Of Conduct is not part of the HSX Rules - it is simply a guideline posted by an HSX member.
{nm}
RotoHockeyYTD2012
Aug 26, 14:24
No, but it is a basic rule. This issue has already been decided, and no amount of badgering or annoying will change it.
eallensbp
Aug 26, 14:39
Sure they are. Even though they are no longer published on the site, they still apply.
{nm}
RogerMore
Aug 26, 14:59
I think any forum should have those rules. They're so common sense, kind of like saying "Please" & "Thank You" & "Excuse Me". Simple stuff.
{nm}
eallensbp
Aug 26, 15:22