boards to find the ones that are directly connected to actual Starbonds.
I'm aware there could be an argument made that even an actor without a Starbond could potentially affect the movie price, especially if, as with Coon, they're recognizable in some way. And I'm not trying to be a jerk for asking; I was just wondering if the site had some boilerplate reason for it.
On the flip side, there are a lot of posts announcing the involvement of talent without associated bonds. If one were inclined to make it, the opposing argument would be that, in terms of HSX trading, it is non-essential information that gluts the board with non-news. And that it ultimately wastes traders' time to have to sift through what is comparatively "curiosity information." And if it's not directly related to actual trading, one could argue that it has no more place on the boards than rumors and unconfirmed speculation, because all of those things are technically outside the purview of the game's system. You could make the argument that the only talent-related news should be that pertaining to talent that is "live" within the game.
Anyway, not trying to stir the pot... but as I see more and more news items like this, I was just wondering if HSX had an explanation for it, or if the question about it being relevant had never been asked or addressed, and if there was no official company line.