HSX Forum
Movies
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/search/?q=jackass
Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa |
Par. |
$102,003,019 |
3,345 |
$32,055,177 |
3,336 |
10/25/2013 |
Images |
Jackass 3-D |
Par. |
$117,229,692 |
3,139 |
$50,353,641 |
3,081 |
10/15/2010 |
Images |
Jackass: Number Two |
Par. |
$72,778,712 |
3,063 |
$29,002,002 |
3,059 |
9/22/2006 |
Trailers Images |
Jackass: The Movie |
Par. |
$64,255,312 |
2,532 |
$22,763,437 |
2,509 |
10/25/2002 |
Trailer |
Mission: Impossible 6 |
Par. |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
7/27/2018 |
Showtimes |
Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation |
Par. |
$195,042,377 |
3,988 |
$55,520,089 |
3,956 |
7/31/2015 |
Images |
Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol |
Par. |
$209,397,903 |
3,555 |
$12,785,204 |
425 |
12/16/2011 |
Images |
Mission: Impossible III |
Par. |
$134,029,801 |
4,059 |
$47,743,273 |
4,054 |
5/5/2006 |
Trailers Images |
Mission: Impossible II |
Par. |
$215,409,889 |
3,669 |
$57,845,297 |
3,653 |
5/24/2000 |
|
Mission: Impossible |
Par. |
$180,981,856 |
3,012 |
$45,436,830 |
3,012 |
5/22/1996 |
Showtimes |
V: APES3 Tracking $55m-$65m
tomcat90
Jul 04, 06:55
Surely APES3 reviews will help push it higher than APES2. Are they expecting SPID6 performance to hinder APES3 performance?
{nm}
Jay_Beezy
Jul 04, 07:50
I think it will be the other way around. SPID6 looks so bad, there's going to be reboot fatigue. APES3 will benefit
{nm}
JonHH
Jul 04, 07:58
SPID6 has 93% on RT with almost 90 reviews. Your argument is invalid.
{nm}
Jay_Beezy
Jul 04, 08:09
Could be. Or maybe the continuation of franchise fatigue.
{nm}
-JPV-
Jul 04, 08:20
Yes, exactly, fatigue of Hollywood's easy recipe for money. How many times can we keep paying for essentially the same movie
{nm}
JonHH
Jul 04, 08:22
James Bond?
{nm}
CSBD
Jul 04, 11:24
Star Trek? Star Wars? Fast & Furious?
{nm}
FOXX Fund (ndmaster)
Jul 04, 21:04
Fatigue can be correlated with a decrease in creativity with their franchises (see Pirates and Transformers).
Jay_Beezy
Jul 04, 11:45
agree the quality is there but its possible the marketing isnt connecting. thats why tracking is softer
{nm}
Moviesnob
Jul 04, 14:23
V: Tracking $55 million to $65 million [APES3]
{nm}
Antibody
Jul 04, 09:09
DL: tracking high $50M range. rivals say $70M-$80M.
Antibody
Jul 04, 14:28
It's not suddenly going to boom way higher than the last two. It will be another strong film, it will do well, let's not go crazy here lol.
{nm}
goodvibe61
Jul 04, 11:51
The last one opened close to 80 mil inflation adjusted. 65 mil for this one would constitute a significant drop for the franchise
ßionicℳoron™
Jul 04, 12:40
Conversely, Amazing SPID 1 and 2 opened at 62 and 91.6 but somehow homecoming opens at 110+?! I just don't buy it
{nm}
JonHH
Jul 04, 13:54
I think the reasoning is, unlike those, this is part of the MCU and Downey Jr.'s Iron Man is more or less a co-star.
{nm}
-JPV-
Jul 04, 14:04
That's fair. But lately, there is a scary pattern of BO disappointment and fatigue re: franchises. People want new, e.g. Wonder W
{nm}
JonHH
Jul 04, 14:24
Just 2 months ago, GOTG2 did better than GOTG.
{nm}
Antibody
Jul 04, 14:30
Wonder Woman is a franchise film
{nm}
Moviesnob
Jul 04, 14:41
I'm not saying sequels can't do well, I'm saying the third reboot of a franchise in my opinion is not a slam dunk
{nm}
JonHH
Jul 04, 14:45
Agree, but I think nothing is a slam dunk. It helps to make a good movie from a known property that you promote well though
{nm}
Moviesnob
Jul 04, 14:54
The 'Jackass' Movies are a Slam Dunk. The 'Mission Impossible' Movies & the James Bond Movies are a Slam Dunk.
Captain Obvious
Jul 04, 15:32
Transformers was a slam dunk...until this one. Pirates was a slam dunk...until this one.
ßionicℳoron™
Jul 04, 15:50
Especially considering the last 3 Spider-Man movies have ranged from mediocre (last reboot) to painful to watch (the last one).
ßionicℳoron™
Jul 04, 15:57