DL: [MIB4] tracking $40M; [SHAF2] $20M-$22M May 23, 08:37
Yeah. That looks accurate. I don't really see any high fan demand for MIB at all. {nm} May 23, 08:41
That's clearly manipulation. ("How could it be overpriced when it hasn't opened yet." --Antibody)" SCRUB THIS {nm} May 23, 08:52
Wrong. He's talking about opening weekend box office, not stock price. {nm} May 23, 08:58
The two are correlated. In fact, that's the whole point of HSX {nm} May 23, 09:00
So you're saying box office has absolutely nothing to do with stock price? Then why trade at all? {nm} May 23, 09:20
Do talk about box office. Don't talk about about stock price. Trading is optional. {nm} May 23, 09:38
Talking about one is talking about the other. If not, on what basis do you value stocks? {nm} May 23, 09:44
Every factor influences expected B.O. and thus the value of the stock {nm} May 23, 10:59
Wrong, grasshopper. A player sometimes plays the players, not the expected or actual value(s) of a security. May 23, 15:32
I don't base my playing of this GAME on one persons opinion about how a movie will open. Should you? {nm} May 23, 11:11
Of course not. But if its policy that discussion of the value of stocks should be scrubbed, that policy should be evenly applied May 23, 12:32
You seem to be the only one who doesn't understand the difference between box office and stock price. {nm} May 23, 12:49
Really? When a stock delists, how do you determine the delist price of a stock if not the box office? {nm} May 23, 12:55
Keep trolling and you won't get to post at all. {nm} May 23, 12:56
I am not trolling. {nm} May 23, 13:01
V: MIB4 $40 million; SHAF2 $16 million range May 23, 09:00
What's strange is I know more than one person who believe WSMIT is in MIB4 despite the fact that he's clearly not. May 23, 09:01
He "is" but it's not what you think (spoiler) May 23, 09:46
almost as much as Paramount paid for Down Under Cover at Cannes! {nm} May 23, 09:09