(This was just to point out that last May wasn't *THAT* much better... not really to argue this was the worst May ever.) Jun 01, 10:26
I'm saying for the whole Month of May. 2010 is ~$778M which is just better than 2001 and 2000. Jun 01, 10:28
Yeah, it's a down month for sure... some surmise that the downturn in the stock market recently hasn't helped... Jun 01, 10:49
I also attribute it to uninspiring movies not worth their price in admission. {nm} Jun 01, 22:03
I can say that Star Trek was no anomoly, I preached the message with all my first posts. Jun 01, 10:37
Last year also had Wolverine ($85M+), Night at the Museum ($70M) and Up ($68M). So Star Trek wasn't really an anomaly. {nm} Jun 01, 11:23
ERC says worst Memorial Day in 17 years {nm} Jun 01, 10:24
A couple has anything lived up to expectations in a month, worse yet a few post down asks about multiplier and Jun 01, 10:31
I don't want to over simply, but it was the worst in 10 years because the films weren't very good. {nm} Jun 01, 10:35
Agreed, and it's not gonna turn around until we get that breakout hit. {nm} Jun 01, 10:38
Yes, at which point the market will begin to think that lots of things could break out that in all likelihood will not. :-) Jun 01, 13:19
In an age of twitter a bad movie will not have repeat business, it may not get out of the starting blocks. MacGruber! {nm} Jun 01, 10:39
Except 90% of what you'll read on Twitter about MacGruber is positive... Jun 01, 10:51
a 2 1/2 hour running time probably didn't help much either... {nm} Jun 01, 10:52
No, but I bet we see it do fine over the next few days and Friday... Jun 01, 10:56
I am sure it is more than twitter, and it may do very well in the home market (uncut version). SATC2 will make some money back Jun 01, 13:06
Terminator and Night at the Museum 2 weren't that good either... I'd say on par with this weekend's offerings. {nm} Jun 01, 18:26