HSX Forum
TVStocks, MusicStocks and Life
Then I respectfully suggest not moderating based on that. (More inside)
Posted by: DTravel on Nov 30, 13:48
in response to Antibody's post No.
It is not fair to the players and posters to moderate according to rules that are hidden from them. Posting counter arguments as another player is fine but you need to make it clear when you are posting as a player and when you are posting as a Moderator. As it currently stands we have no way of differentiating between the two with your posts. You do great with game regulation (Calls To Action, No News Tags and such) but political/social discussions involving strong opinions need a less personal approach.
I say this as someone with forum moderation experience on a couple of different forums, both of which had thousands of times more posters than the HSX forums see. I know what I'm suggesting isn't always easy. People do and say stupid stuff, sometimes amazingly stupid stuff, but you need to not take it or let it affect you personally. I respect what you do for the game, Antibody. This suggestion is meant as constructive criticism, not intended as a personal attack and I hope you can read this as such.
Thank you.
#DiaperDon at his tiny desk throwing a tantrum
Antibody
Nov 27, 08:36
I would Never ask my friends to join this game with the ravid anti Trump garbage going on at the top
{nm}
goldster
Nov 27, 13:36
Oh no, how sad
{nm}
platonm
Nov 27, 15:29
It is kind of sad, and unprofessional.
{nm}
ndmaster
Nov 27, 22:16
Exactly, a President using his position to lie everyday and claim election fraud without any evidence.
{nm}
Antibody
Nov 28, 07:13
Antibody, on second thought, we should be more professional to Trump, after all he did pay like $3M to further solidify his own loss...
platonm
Nov 28, 09:16
Just Fleece Those Suckers.
RotoHockeyYTD2014
Nov 28, 09:42
B: Pro-Trump donor wants his $2.5 million donation back
Antibody
Nov 28, 09:59
Agreed, but you, too.
ndmaster
Nov 28, 11:14
This is a messageboard, there's nothing in the HSX blog or Twitter feed.
{nm}
Antibody
Nov 28, 12:13
So, since it is 'private', it's OK?
ndmaster
Nov 28, 23:13
I kinda see your point, ndm. But as part of the block of 80 million voters that see through the sham that is Trump, we kinda don't care
Catzan
Nov 28, 23:51
Yes, I'm biased against lies and ignorance. As moderator, I'm pro-truth and pro-science.
{nm}
Antibody
Nov 29, 09:51
Is being ignorant and religious against the posted forum rules?
{nm}
DTravel
Nov 29, 15:35
No.
{nm}
Antibody
Nov 30, 08:33
Then I respectfully suggest not moderating based on that. (More inside)
DTravel
Nov 30, 13:48
Ok, but I don't take anything or have it affect me personally.
{nm}
Antibody
Nov 30, 15:10
You seem to imply that religion is the opposite of science, which is not the case. I clearly said science is the opposite of ignorance.
{nm}
Antibody
Nov 30, 15:17
I was trying to be polite.
{nm}
DTravel
Nov 30, 18:33
Ok to disenfranchise roughly half the country to stay tight with your liberal buddies? You won't grow your game on that soapbox
{nm}
goldster
Nov 30, 18:06
74 million people represents about 25% of the U.S. And this election was not about liberal or conservative. It was obviously about Trump.
{nm}
Catzan
Nov 30, 22:32
No, disenfranchise is what Trump is trying to do to Americans who voted in the election.
{nm}
Antibody
Dec 01, 07:39