Are you truly so narrow minded that you can't see someone could object to this behavior on grounds other than those you state? I would Dec 29, 08:28
CALLED IT. {nm} Dec 29, 11:12
Translation: Why, yes I am. {nm} Dec 29, 11:41
The definition of Treason does not include what you are suggesting. You may want to look up "Prosecutoral Discrection". {nm} Dec 29, 12:30
GODWIN'S LAW: Poster Automatically Loses the Argument when Invoking the NAZIS or HITLER. Dec 29, 13:27
LOL. {nm} Jan 11, 00:02
If this is the worst that is done by state governments he is getting off very lightly, IMHO Dec 29, 15:07
No, a military court can't try the President. {nm} Dec 29, 15:55
What's the fun of becoming a banana republic if you can't play with the toys Dec 29, 18:54
Well, thanks for making my point! It is 3rd world, & you approve because you agree THIS TIME. {nm} Dec 31, 05:51
At the NATIONAL level there is no provision for that. The 14th Amendment is very specific about what disqualifies someone. Dec 29, 15:54
Who, in your judgment, should enforce the constitution's insurrection disqualification with respect to a state election? Dec 30, 18:19
The appropriate bodies once there is a conviction of insurrection. NOT this. This does nothing but strengthen trump, Dec 31, 05:49
You are RIGHT - They did Remove a Slimy Dictator from the Ballots. {nm} Dec 31, 08:15
Appeasing a bunch of disaffected, delusional, un-American misfits seems a poor choice and shabby motivation{nm} Jan 01, 10:00
How is that relevant? Who was prosecuted? {nm} Dec 31, 05:52
It can't be treason is the law gives law enforcement the authority to prioritize.... {nm} Dec 31, 16:34
How is that relevant? Who was prosecuted? {nm} Dec 31, 05:52