If you really want to be "All in" , There at least 2 Funds that ought to be renamed AVNGRFUND May 05, 23:27
correction... May 05, 23:31
There are 3 funds actually that went 100% Avengers {nm} May 06, 04:51
....and these are bad strategies? Object of the fund: to maximize profits. Do you have better ideas for short term gains? {nm} May 06, 06:10
Yes bad strategy for a fund. It's supposed to represent smaller risk than buying the equity directly. May 06, 06:15
Not in HSX. Funds are more about showing new traders how to play, and how different strategies work in action. May 06, 07:02
Just because that's what funds are currently in HSX, doesn't mean that's how it should be. May 06, 08:33
Not sure if anyone said it was a bad strategy, until elchan {nm} May 06, 07:04
It's because 'actually' can mean different things, depending on where it's placed in a sentence May 06, 07:27
Translation for RogerMore May 06, 07:30
Translation for Razorhawk May 06, 07:47
+1 for proper usage of both imply and infer. May 06, 07:57
is this correct? May 06, 08:04
You are correct, 100%. It is a pet peeve, like nails on a chalkboard. May 06, 08:35
J.L. Austin thanks you for your efforts. :) May 06, 08:10
AFRAM is invested in as much Avengers as it could afford. {nm} May 06, 05:26
As is DISNXFund (nm) May 06, 07:11