Movies

DL: [SINST] gets 11/11/16 date; [UNCHT] gets 6/10/16; [SPID6] pushed back to 2018 Oleg Max Jul 23, 09:29

wow, 2 years further for SPID6... must really be re-thinking direction of the film {nm} lobogotti Jul 23, 09:35

You're looking at this all wrong. This is a good thing for the Spider-Man franchise... ~JPV~ Jul 23, 09:37

+1 {nm} gogreenytd Jul 23, 09:41

+1. They're giving it time to breathe. {nm} chosenone2oo5 Jul 23, 09:44

I was being snarky with my response, but giving it an extra 2 years to get a good script and maybe a different director is needed {nm} ~JPV~ Jul 23, 09:49

Quite Enjoyed the GOOD NEWS Snarkiness. {nm} RotoHockeyYTD2014 Jul 23, 10:01

But not when I made the exact same snarky comment and follow-up explanation. {nm} Antibody Jul 23, 13:24

haha... are you saying that they are planning a reboot.... {nm} b4bad Jul 23, 12:30

It needs to die anyway. {nm} Juiced Jul 23, 11:44

Orci and El Maymibe were wrong about the demise of Sinister Six. {nm} Antibody Jul 23, 09:46

So it seems like SINST is first, as planned, and SPID6 took the date of SPID7...but where does "Venom" fit into their plans now? 2017? {nm} chosenone2oo5 Jul 23, 09:49

The question is will Spider-Man show up in SINST? How many film is AGARF signed? He may be too old by 2018. {nm} Antibody Jul 23, 09:58

If its from sinister pov it would make sense to just have a suited Spiderman that could be CGI {nm} notfabio Jul 23, 10:11

Hope they dont use the same cast from Amazing and uste SINIST as the new spiderman universe without needing to reboot {nm} gogreenytd Jul 23, 10:36

How do the market prices for sinst and pirt5 adjust to their new value when so many shares are already owned? NLitend1 Jul 23, 17:26

Price is determined by how it is traded not by what is owned {nm} JDolphin Jul 23, 17:39