HOLLYWOOD STOCK EXCHANGE
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
THE ENTERTAINMENT MARKET
Stop falling back on Kinsey everytime someone refers to science, there have been plenty of studies, all more convincing, since {nm}
Time to drop the Atom Bomb in here: All Christians are basically atheists Mar 26, 21:34
Over the line. Harassment. Time to scrub. Against code of conduct. {nm} Mar 26, 22:33
Harassment to who? BSmurf has valid points. Why is it ok to make religious arguments, but not atheist ones? Mar 27, 06:13
Noted. There is a limit to what kind of discussion is acceptable. This is NOT. We got on A4J's back pretty hard Mar 27, 10:55
Have I scrubbed any of A4J's posts? {nm} Mar 27, 11:05
Maybe not...but at least you admonished the behavior. silence means consent dear boy, and you silence in spades. {nm} Mar 27, 11:27
I think if you're taking BSmurf's post seriously, you've failed the test. {nm} Mar 27, 12:09
You removed A4J from managing the AWARD Fund without notice. {nm} Mar 27, 15:40
This unwarranted action caused Tanker to quit HSX (18OCT2012). {nm} Mar 27, 15:41
Psst Mar 27, 15:52
I'm relieved someone equating homosexuality with rape and pedophila is no longer a fund manager. {nm} Mar 27, 15:57
Kinsey did it, so why aren't you railing on him too? Mar 27, 17:05
If Kinsey played this game, you'd have a point - but not until then {nm} Mar 28, 00:20
Stop falling back on Kinsey everytime someone refers to science, there have been plenty of studies, all more convincing, since Mar 28, 16:26
Who are you calling an idiot? The scientific evidence for homosexuality is growing and will be proven in time. Mar 27, 11:01
While we're at it,could you please post next week's winning lottery numbers? {nm} Mar 27, 11:26
Shrug. Progress will eventually show who's been standing on the right side of history. {nm} Mar 27, 11:33
I'm still reading about it. Don't assume that just because I don't answer immediately it means I can't respond. Mar 27, 14:27
Scientific evidence for homosexuality? What does that mean? Scientific evidence that it exists? Mar 27, 12:39
You believe that there are fellow human beings who are born undesirable? Wow. {nm} Mar 27, 12:52
that's a silly, inflammatory statement. Cystic fibrosis is genetically based. Does anyone desire it? Mar 28, 09:19
I did NOT say cystic fibrosis was equivalent to hemosexuality. I said having a genetic predisposition to something does not Mar 28, 12:42
No one. I merely said it was not conducive to replicating itself. {nm} Mar 29, 12:53
No, you originally said beinng genetically predisposed to be homosexual is not desirable. Nothing about replicating. {nm} Mar 29, 16:34
Stephen F Roberts quote Mar 27, 06:04
+1 {nm} Mar 27, 06:13
You should post this quote as the heading. It perfectly sums my opinion. I was going to post this till I read your post. {nm} Mar 28, 00:15
You're right, but it was too long. {nm} Mar 28, 07:35
Here's a good example of BSmurf's point. Go to the 7:20 mark. Mar 27, 06:34
Interesting only because this is the crime Rome convicted early Xians of when they wouldn't acknowledge other gods. {nm} Mar 27, 09:16
As an exercise in logic, utter rot. Claiming all religions get equal %, even if they have 2 adherents as opposed to 2 billion, Mar 27, 09:21
Your argument is full of conclusions (not facts, but opinions) with no fact to support them. A = C? (where is the +B). Mar 27, 10:58
My final thoughts on all this: you have the freedom to believe what you want to believe and love who you want to love. Mar 27, 11:35
In some parts of the world only. Regrettably. {nm} Mar 27, 12:42
Bashing Christianity is perfectly within the TOS of HSX. Others religions, not so much. Mar 27, 14:08
Time to respond with an atom bomb: All atheists are simply agnostic. Mar 27, 14:10
No, no, you're ALL wrong (agnostics excepted) Mar 27, 16:38
How is faith illogical when you exercise it every day? Mar 27, 16:54
You're conflating faith with knowledge based on interactions (learning) with real people and real objects. Mar 27, 17:22
I think there's a difference between faith and trust. {nm} Mar 27, 17:26
Oh dear....I hate to burst your bubble.... Mar 27, 17:27
Blind faith is illogical. Faith based on evidence is not. Perhaps I have evidence you do not? Or have interpreted the Mar 28, 09:25
You can call it evidence all you want -- I call it willingness to wear rose-colored glasses. Mar 28, 11:07
( ^ reply to forlorne) {nm} Mar 28, 11:08
You call WHAT wearing rose-colored glasses? how can you deny the validity of evidence you are not even aware of? Mar 28, 12:45
I know how the believers' evidence game is played. Sorry. {nm} Mar 28, 13:19
Wanna wager on that? {nm} Mar 29, 12:53
