HSX Forum

Movies

Side games can be a fun addition, but it doesn't solve the main problem

Posted by: shadowking (a.k.a shadowking13) on Dec 28, 12:50 in response to lobogotti's post Suggestions for new Contests and Games

Bonds, warrants, options, derivatives etc all add some value, as do player run games that HSX can and should co-opt (seasonal top 5, #1 movies 6 months out etc), but they are all secondary.  The stocks have always been the headline attraction of the site, and they are broken. 

Let's be honest - it's easy to complain about the adjust change.  I know I've done so quite a bit, but there is was problem.  As genre fare continues to get more front loaded, it's creating even more variance between the shortest and longest legs of mainstream movies.  There's just no need to multiply CAPA3 by 2.7, when even great reviews can't keep it from earning almost 50% of its revenue in the first 3 1/2 days, just as there's no need to multiply any holiday release by 2.7, when most are going to make at least 4 times opening weekend.  There's unfortunately something of a catch-22 in trying to find a solution.

One way to solve the Super's/Hunger Games/Potter style frontloading would be to keep Thursday preview numbers in the "prev+" part of the adjust equation and out of the multiplier.  They still will be frontloaded, but well within reason.  However, this exacerbates the holiday season issue.

Another solution is the one currently in place.  While it doesn't artificially move genre fare up, or holiday fare down, it does minimize the most fun thing about box office - opening weekend.  With no halt, the stocks are no longer really about prediction, but rather reaction, first to players, then to numbers.  The thing that makes headlines in entertainment news, and is the most fun to argue about is now reduced to something to react to.

Genre and season specific multipliers, in a perfect world, would be an ideal solution.  Realistically?  Almost impossible to administer, and a high learning curve for users, which is never a good thing, as Moviesnob has astutely pointed out.

Would a combo of removing Thursday previews from the multiplier, while having a special seasonal multiplier for only the last 3 weeks of December both solve the issue and be simple enough to manage?  Maybe?

Is the solution to shift a bit of focus to the OWs?  I still consider them something of a side-thing, like calls and puts, buried at the bottom of the port.  Would upping the stakes (250k shares?) help?  IPOing not 2 weeks out, but 3+ months out?  Adding a new section of the site for them apart from the calls/puts/warrant/tv etc?  I'm really just throwing stuff out there as I can't say any of this would solve the issue.

Suggestions for new Contests and Games lobogotti Dec 28, 06:34

also, this gives other traders the opportunity to be recognized on a regular... the way people are recognized on Kaigee lobogotti Dec 28, 06:41

people are leaving and many left are frustrated, so maybe a suit from cantor could get in here and at least tell us whats up islander Dec 28, 06:49

there's no doubt. it's very apparent. I hope for the same. {nm} lobogotti Dec 28, 06:59

It's the holidays. Don't expect anything real soon {nm} JMT-NL Dec 28, 08:16

Players have become dependent on the adjust as a measuring stick for success. {nm} HSXiphos Dec 28, 08:55

History says both Sing and Assassin's Creed are under-priced, people aren't comfortable with no adjust... so both prices are unstable. {nm} HSXiphos Dec 28, 08:52

They would have been even more underpriced if they had adjusted under the old rules. {nm} Antibody Dec 28, 09:05

Haha... You're a card. Direct question: what is your feeling about these postings with suggestions for the site ? {nm} JMT-NL Dec 28, 09:11

Good suggestions, some better than others. We know the site and demographics are aging. We need to attract more players. {nm} Antibody Dec 28, 09:22

I think you can by adopting some games/contests. make it a tad more social and give reason for people to conversate. lobogotti Dec 28, 10:53

Nedding more players is not your problem... Chimpmuck Dec 28, 11:16

I bet there is more than just a "small number" of very active users. I would ventue to guess lots of smaller ports are very active. RollingThunder Dec 28, 11:34

An official app for Android and iPhone could pull players from the mobile app markets. {nm} HSXiphos Dec 28, 11:21

Speaking nothing of the logistics of creating such an app, this would absolutely attract new players. RollingThunder Dec 28, 11:29

What's the business model though? Unless you' {nm} RogerMore Dec 28, 11:56

... you've got a way of funding the development and support of an app, it's not going to happen. And the usual business models - pay-to-play RogerMore Dec 28, 11:58

Ad supported apps are where it's at. You can't think of any advertising possibilities for a game centered on movie predictions. Honestly? {nm} HSXiphos Dec 28, 16:34

Yep, no market would ever target a pool of people with a vested interest in movies, television shows, and actors... ;-) {nm} HSXiphos Dec 28, 16:39

How much advertising does HSX attract now? {nm} RogerMore Dec 28, 20:46

or maybe keeping the current players & bringing the thousands of inactive ones back somehow {nm} adrenalin112 Dec 28, 11:31

I just assumed there is enough historical data to tweak the multiplier for holiday weekends and early week openers, improving accuracy.. {nm} HSXiphos Dec 28, 11:24

Lobo=MVP :) {nm} tomcat90 Dec 28, 07:41

You probably need to stick to the predictive market aspect of the game, rather than build games along side it Moviesnob Dec 28, 11:58

Yep - as you (lobo) said in your OP, the opening weekend is everything, so the focus should be on that. I don't see the player interest in RogerMore Dec 28, 12:00

I'm curious if you've played around with your data and if you have thoughts about a simple adjust multiple that is better than 2.7? Moviesnob Dec 28, 12:10

I haven't played around with it - but the game needs to be simple. I don't think rules that give different multipliers for different types RogerMore Dec 28, 12:18

hmm, i wonder why its skewing their data then. {nm} Moviesnob Dec 28, 12:54

I think because multipliers are diverging - blockbuster movies have increasingly shorter legs, other movies have longer, so it averages out. RogerMore Dec 28, 13:09

yeah, that makes sense. but if the delist is really causing people to leave, then whats the common ground? Moviesnob Dec 28, 13:46

I don't think there are any easy answers here - otherwise we'd already have a solution. {nm} RogerMore Dec 28, 20:45

you could build a contest prediciting the 4 week multiplier from OW as well. {nm} lobogotti Dec 28, 13:40

thats what HSX is relying on - that players will account for OW & the 4 week multiplier but the feedback is that they cant or dont want to {nm} Moviesnob Dec 28, 13:56

maybe HSX crafts a survey with many options and allows users to vote on one, some or all options. {nm} lobogotti Dec 28, 14:05

maybe, but i have yet to see an idea presented that, in my opinion, gives HSX the data they needs using the market HSX built. Moviesnob Dec 28, 14:58

Perhaps this has been discussed before, but how did the adjust compromise HSX's ability to generate pre-OW data? {nm} second gary Dec 28, 19:08

HSX seems to be most interested in predicting how much money a movie will make over 4 weekends. But moviestock prices were based on the RogerMore Dec 28, 20:44

Then stocks should be OW only priced...and derivatives should handle projected 4 week BO TwoMisfits Dec 29, 14:20

Side games can be a fun addition, but it doesn't solve the main problem shadowking Dec 28, 12:50

Upping the stakes for the OW 's sounds ok to me. Maybe topping the normal stocks at the same time JMT-NL Dec 29, 01:27

One idea I've been thinking of is essentially flipping the moviestocks and the OWs. RogerMore Dec 29, 08:28

thank you for the word you've put into these - thursday midnights contest sounds particularly interesting {nm} daveart Dec 28, 13:24





Post a Reply

To post to the forums you must first login!


Piece by Piece (PCBPC) 20000 21.91 (+0.14)          Blake Lively (BLIVE) 25000 32.72 (-1.21)          Blake Lively (BLIVE) 25000 32.72 (-1.21)          Bradley Cooper (BCOOP) 25000 124.40 (-2.77)          Bradley Cooper (BCOOP) 25000 124.40 (-2.77)          Awkwafina (AWKWA) 25000 136.26 (+2.95)          Awkwafina (AWKWA) 25000 136.26 (+2.95)          RZA (RZA) 25000 53.04 (+0.16)          Lupita Nyong'o (LNYON) 25000 166.35 (0.00)          Alan Kim (AKIM) 25000 41.36 (+4.13)          Alan Kim (AKIM) 25000 41.36 (+4.13)          Jamie Foxx (JFOXX) 25000 71.17 (0.00)          Thomas Haden Church (THCHU) 25000 85.86 (+0.75)          Thomas Haden Church (THCHU) 25000 85.86 (+0.75)          Seth Rogen (SROGE) 25000 131.53 (-0.66)          Seth Rogen (SROGE) 25000 131.53 (-0.66)          Stephanie Hsu (SHSU) 25000 73.65 (+0.25)          The Rivals Of Amziah King (TROAK) 150000 8.17 (+0.69)          Stephanie Hsu (SHSU) 25000 73.65 (+0.25)          The Rivals Of Amziah King (TROAK) 150000 8.17 (+0.69)          Emily Blunt (EBLUN) 25000 141.08 (+12.81)          Emily Blunt (EBLUN) 25000 141.08 (+12.81)          Ryan Reynolds (RREYN) 25000 91.12 (-3.08)          Ryan Reynolds (RREYN) 25000 91.12 (-3.08)          Inside Out 2 (INOU2) 7994 275.01 (+0.90)          Pom Klementieff (PKLEM) 25000 184.45 (+0.50)          Blake Lively (BLIVE) 25000 32.72 (-1.21)          Blake Lively (BLIVE) 25000 32.72 (-1.21)          Keegan-Michael Key (KMKEY) 25000 146.69 (-4.08)          Keegan-Michael Key (KMKEY) 25000 146.69 (-4.08)          Bradley Cooper (BCOOP) 25000 124.40 (-2.77)          Bradley Cooper (BCOOP) 25000 124.40 (-2.77)          The Long Walk (TLWLK) 149999 10.83 (+0.24)          Isabella Rossellini (IROSS) 25000 43.74 (-2.99)          Isabella Rossellini (IROSS) 25000 43.74 (-2.99)          Amy Schumer (ASCHU) 25000 60.08 (-0.28)          Gal Gadot (GGADO) 25000 139.58 (+0.33)          Gerard Butler (GBUTL) 25000 53.67 (+0.33)          Eddie Marsan (EMARS) 25000 2.77 (-1.48)          Eddie Marsan (EMARS) 25000 2.77 (-1.48)          Eiza Gonzalez (EGONZ) 25000 35.01 (-0.25)          Amy Schumer (ASCHU) 25000 60.08 (-0.28)          Eiza Gonzalez (EGONZ) 25000 35.01 (-0.25)          Emily Blunt (EBLUN) 25000 141.08 (+12.81)          Emily Blunt (EBLUN) 25000 141.08 (+12.81)          Chris Pine (CPINE) 25000 40.24 (-0.30)          Christian Bale (CBALE) 25000 99.24 (-0.25)          Blake Lively (BLIVE) 25000 32.72 (-1.21)          Blake Lively (BLIVE) 25000 32.72 (-1.21)          Bradley Cooper (BCOOP) 25000 124.40 (-2.77)