Movies

Dear HSX - why set a IPO share amount if you aren't going to let the stock move after that amount is reached? 17 million more only 1.70 up {nm} JDolphin Sep 13, 21:34

"How poor are they that have not patience. What wound did ever heal but by degrees?" - W.S. {nm} ryeontherocks Sep 13, 22:13

One cannot but admire that first fresh prince. second gary Sep 14, 08:23

In a thread a couple months ago about price movement someone said you shouldn't ask about "the man behind the curtain" {nm} MattW Sep 13, 22:55

I know, if they have to answer one question, then they may have to answer 2.... {nm} Mealticket Sep 14, 10:17

I think there was something said about when the price of the stock is higher, it takes more shares to generate movement, {nm} Dorfman Sep 14, 06:31

I don't think that makes that much sense, though. To use a hypothetical example: Ruthian23 Sep 14, 09:56

You're last line is exactly my point - I just want HSX to be honest about when they are actually going to let the price move {nm} JDolphin Sep 14, 10:22

Your assumption is wrong. There's no "unique" setting for securities that exceed its IPO shares. {nm} Antibody Sep 14, 11:12

Then why didn't the stock move more than 1.87? Plenty of other stocks moved up and down yesterday - if there is nothing unique about post JDolphin Sep 14, 18:50

Its known that its not just how many shares but also how fast or slow they are bought that are factors. DTravel Sep 14, 11:48

I've heard that except - yesterday 23 mi shares after IPO vs 21 mil today - 1.87 change vs .8.48. {nm} JDolphin Sep 14, 10:19

Gotta agree with DTravel too. i belive how fast or slow they are bought has something to do with it too. Dorfman Sep 15, 06:38