HSX Forum

Playing & Trading Strategy

The First Amendment guarantees the RIGHT to say whatever you want. It does NOT guarantee the means.

Posted by: JohnTEQP on Dec 02, 19:13 in response to RotoHockeyYTD2012's post Exceptional at reading. Small wonder they have to butter...

If you want to stand on a street corner and yell obscenities about your neighbor, go right ahead. If you want to write a novel on your own computer that slanders everyone you know, feel free. If you want to post nonsense on your own blog, you have a First Amendment RIGHT to do so. What the First Amendment does not guarantee is that you will have access to any particular MEANS for HOW you say it. You have the right to, for example, make a movie. You have the freedom to try to make your movie, but whether or not you make it is up to you. You do not have a right to the equipment, actors, etc. to make said movie. HSX is an example of the MEANS of saying what you want, not the RIGHT. You can write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper, but they are under no obligation to publish it. You can write a screenplay, but studios are not under any obligation to produce your movie. HSX controls this space, just like a newspaper company controls the publication of the newspaper, or a studio controls what it produces. HSX provides you the MEANS by which you can post messages. But HSX is the company that controls access to that means, not you. If you want to write messages about HSX or any other user and post them to your own blog, HSX cannot tell you not to. But that would also mean that no one would listen to you, unless you can convince them to read your blog. Because that's another thing about the First Amendment: it guarantees you the right to say whatever you want. One of the other things it DOES NOT guarantee is whether or not anyone will listen to you.

 

 

 

I've been busy on other projects lately, but there are two new articles on HSXsanity. RogerMore Nov 30, 14:08

thx {nm} tealfan Nov 30, 15:17

Au contraire. What you say on HSX is protected by the First Amendment. RotoHockeyYTD2012 Nov 30, 17:24

I am not bound, nor protected, by First Amendment. So, I guess those rules don't apply to me. Good thing there is a CoC... {nm} PVL Admin Nov 30, 19:11

Who said anything about losing First Amendment rights? Not me. RogerMore Nov 30, 19:50

Are you a constitutional lawyer (whatever that means)? I am a lawyer whose practice includes the First Amendment. I have concluded that DTXbro Dec 01, 12:09

Yeah, it's not a perfect article. I really wanted to get across that what's said on the boards is governed by the Terms of Use, and the 1st Roger More Dec 01, 14:28

Already did. {nm} RotoHockeyYTD2012 Dec 01, 17:21

I appreciate what you do here. If I believed it appropriate to pick those nits, I would have done it when I first read the article. {nm} DTXbro Dec 01, 19:13

let me try to rephrase what HSXsanity was intending to say... RazorHawk Dec 02, 12:14

Had HSXsanity said exactly that, there would not have been any problem. (See inside). RotoHockeyYTD2012 Dec 02, 15:57

I haven't observed a debate like this about the law since my first year of law school . . . DTXbro Dec 02, 18:48

You don't deserve a response from RogerMore. You {nm} eyescovered Dec 02, 19:10

You were the one who brought the First Amendment into the discussion. Antibody Dec 03, 17:10

Into this discussion? Not at all. Totally different matter and totally different issues. {nm} RotoHockeyYTD2012 Dec 03, 21:08

No, in the discussion of using the First Amendment as an excuse, {nm} Antibody Dec 04, 10:38

He already admitted that he was wrong - already made corrections. {nm} RotoHockeyYTD2012 Dec 03, 21:11

RotoHockey, you should re-examine the law and statutes. Trentacus Dec 03, 08:23

Enlightened - not at all - that's exactly what was being said. (See inside). RotoHockeyYTD2012 Dec 03, 16:49

Your statement, 'What you say on HSX isn't protected by the First Amendment' is patently FALSE. Please remove it. {nm} RotoHockeyYTD2012 Nov 30, 19:47

Still poorly worded - 'action by HSX under the First Amendment'. Please remove 'under the First Amendment'. (See inside). RotoHockeyYTD2012 Nov 30, 20:43

RogerMore explained the First Amendment perfectly, at 19:50, above. Saved me the trouble. Not sure what you're on about. {nm} edzep - Port Monkey! Nov 30, 20:47

Your statement 'The First Amendment applies ... not to private corporations' is patently FALSE. Please remove it. RotoHockeyYTD2012 Nov 30, 20:52

Yeah, I won't be making changes because you're not good at reading. RogerMore Dec 01, 07:00

Exceptional at reading. Small wonder they have to butter the sides of your head to get you through the Theatre Doors. RotoHockeyYTD2012 Dec 01, 12:10

You should start a blog and post there instead of here. Then you can delete all comments that contradict what you think/believe. {nm} eyescovered Dec 01, 12:25

Such name calling! I think I'm done giving you any attention. {nm} Roger More Dec 01, 14:26

Can we call you Butter Head from now on, Roger? Hmm..actually, that sounds more like a Bond girl name. {nm} Paul2k Dec 01, 15:52

Agent Butterhead - he likes he likes a good piece of toast --with butter melted not softened {nm} JDolphin Dec 01, 18:22

Licensed to spread. {nm} RogerMore Dec 02, 09:07

Licensed to fill. {nm} RotoHockeyYTD2012 Dec 02, 11:34

The First Amendment guarantees the RIGHT to say whatever you want. It does NOT guarantee the means. JohnTEQP Dec 02, 19:13

That's a good expansion on freedom of speech. edzep - Port Monkey! Dec 02, 20:40





Post a Reply

To post to the forums you must first login!

Ads disabled on hsx.com


Daniel: The Fiery Furnace (DANIL) 150000 5.00 (0.00)          Creed IV (CREE4) 35000 29.55 (-0.06)          Creed IV (CREE4) 47500 29.55 (-0.06)          Star Wars: The Mandalorian and G (SWAR3) 150000 195.82 (-0.97)          Olivia Holt (OHOLT) 25000 12.31 (-0.51)          Olivia Holt (OHOLT) 25000 12.31 (-0.51)          Lena Headey (LHEAD) 25000 7.84 (-6.63)          Lena Headey (LHEAD) 25000 7.84 (-6.63)          Lena Headey (LHEAD) 25000 7.84 (-6.63)          Daniel: The Fiery Furnace (DANIL) 3000 5.00 (0.00)          Tramell Tillman (TTILL) 1000 149.00 (0.00)          Spider-Man: Brand New Day (SPID9) 447 420.76 (-0.52)          Octet (OCTET) 1000 21.41 (+1.41)          Jack Reynor (JREYN) 25000 17.36 (-0.93)          Daniel: The Fiery Furnace (DANIL) 150000 5.00 (0.00)          Jack Reynor (JREYN) 25000 17.36 (-0.93)          King Snake (KSNAK) 2000 14.42 (-0.34)          Russell Crowe (RCROW) 25000 10.99 (+0.40)          King Snake (KSNAK) 2000 14.42 (-0.34)          Russell Crowe (RCROW) 25000 10.99 (+0.40)          Lena Headey (LHEAD) 25000 7.84 (-6.63)          Lena Headey (LHEAD) 25000 7.84 (-6.63)          Jack Reynor (JREYN) 25000 17.36 (-0.93)          Olivia Holt (OHOLT) 25000 12.31 (-0.51)          Olivia Holt (OHOLT) 25000 12.31 (-0.51)          Juliette Lewis (JLEWI) 25000 14.98 (-0.60)          Ghost of Tsushima (GOTSU) 10000 10.54 (+0.01)          Power Ballad (PWRBL) 150000 16.01 (+0.15)          Horizon: An American Saga Chapte (HORZ2) 10000 9.55 (+0.02)          The Saviors (SAVIR) 1000 4.54 (-0.15)          Drummer Boy (DRUMB) 10000 10.08 (+0.15)          The Saviors (SAVIR) 1000 4.54 (-0.15)          Rush Hour 4 (RUSH4) 150000 17.48 (+0.12)          Rush Hour 4 (RUSH4) 150000 17.48 (+0.12)          Barracuda (BRCUD) 1000 9.04 (+1.01)          The Deb (THDEB) 150000 0.56 (+0.52)          Barracuda (BRCUD) 1000 9.04 (+1.01)          Daniel: The Fiery Furnace (DANIL) 150000 5.00 (0.00)          Ben Wheatley (BWHEA) 25000 18.18 (+0.33)          The Deb (THDEB) 150000 0.56 (+0.52)          Fonda (FONDA) 50000 8.92 (+0.83)          Bob Odenkirk (BODEN) 25000 32.39 (-1.26)          Pendulum (PNDLM) 150000 6.36 (-0.71)          The Wager (WAGER) 40000 16.02 (+0.03)          Pendulum (PNDLM) 150000 6.36 (-0.71)          (Saint) Peter (STPET) 150000 5.63 (+0.66)          (Saint) Peter (STPET) 150000 5.63 (+0.66)          Fonda (FONDA) 150000 8.92 (+0.83)          Fonda (FONDA) 150000 8.92 (+0.83)          The Joy Luck Club 2 (TJLC2) 100000 5.86 (+0.06)