If a stupid looking movie like San Andreas can reap in $50M+, maybe I should just quit, liquidate all shares. America has no taste anymore.
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 12:13
try not to take it so personally.
{nm}
CSBD
May 31, 12:15
Anymore?
{nm}
Biff68
May 31, 12:18
Why so serious?
{nm}
~JPV~
May 31, 12:19
ROFL! {nm}
Chateau_du_Mal_Voisin
May 31, 13:24
I watch what i personally want; I invest in want people want or don't want to watch. Keep those separate.
{nm}
ryeontherocks
May 31, 12:20
This is the right answer.
{nm}
Raven9167
May 31, 12:52
It sure is!
DTshakes
May 31, 15:02
Apparently not, since I'm not talking about the game or investments. I'm talking about why the hell anyone would want to watch this movie.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 15:28
Maybe they like all action no plot. I could go on the same rant about horror films, but why? just because I don't get why people like
JDolphin
May 31, 17:04
A lot of horror movies do suck. But people love them because when they pull it off, it requires every aspect of filmmaking to be executed--
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 19:10
And that's YOUR opinion - never seen a horror film (or part of one) that was worth 2 cents of my time
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 20:33
If you buy or sell on personal taste and/or perceived quality then you should quit because you are going to lose a lot of money..
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 12:26
The game is about quantity not quality
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 12:27
Just like your 20's -- #amIrite? (nm)
DTshakes
May 31, 15:03
Both good and bad movies make money and lose money. Sometimes I understand why sometimes I don't.
MattW
May 31, 12:29
Personally I stopped reading your rant at "autistic genetic trait" (inside)
hyperzeitgeist
May 31, 12:31
A puerile worldview is created from a puerile world. It's not one of those stupid "chicken or the egg" arguments. Also, you assume too much.
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 12:43
See, I stopped reading at "moronical", because that's not actually a word.
{nm}
Sorrannax
May 31, 12:52
Tell Sgt. Lincoln Osiris that. Was quoting him. But like Kirk Lazarus, I know that. Ever be the dude playing the dude disguised as another?
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:09
I usually stop reading when the quick reply headline ends.
{nm}
Bored76er
May 31, 14:11
Well, it was a bad choice of words, but maybe he meant no harm. But i do understand the frustration in horrible flicks making bank.
goodvibe61
May 31, 20:47
Did you short San Andreas OW and call by any chance ;) ?
{nm}
mattep74
May 31, 12:41
I have $2B in my portfolio more than you. You think you're clever, but until you break $100M you don't know this game.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 12:45
But seriously, did you short the .OW and the .CA?
{nm}
RogerMore
May 31, 13:01
But seriously, no.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:22
It's just a game. Personally, I would much rather see a disaster movie than a comic book movie that had been in theaters non stop lately
{nm}
Oleg Max
May 31, 12:49
To that end, you should watch a black and white silent film. There are rarely ever any of those.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:01
You do know that of Birdman, Whiplash, and Boyhood, the highest gross of those three was $42 million?
Raven9167
May 31, 12:50
Independence Day is also a pretty crappy movie. And those box office numbers are exactly what I'm talking about. America has no taste.
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:05
If you turn off your brain and enjoy the crap, you really appreciate the good when it comes along.
{nm}
ryeontherocks
May 31, 13:15
I can do that for far more worthy "guilty pleasures," but those require more skill than "San Andreas" to make well. But you proved my point.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:30
Heh, I won't make the argument about Independence Day, it is certainly a guilty pleasure for me.
Raven9167
May 31, 13:45
But there is a difference between a quality crowd-pleaser that gets people talking ("Guardians of the Galaxy") and a dumb simple BOOM-BOOM.
chosenone2oo5
Jun 01, 00:43
Yes because Jason Statham and Guy Ritchie are American exports. Euros enjoy their trash the same as all do, no hypocritical bashing please.
{nm}
Bored76er
May 31, 18:09
I
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 19:11
I've seen television shows from the UK that are far superior to film--not only from a screenwriting aspect, but acting and directing as well
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 19:12
Demand for more "original, adult-oriented" programming (not San Andreas) have pushed more limited releases lately into wider releases.
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 15:51
Easy reply to that loooong post. Shut up, quit whining.
{nm}
thefootballfreak
May 31, 13:00
It's a summer disaster popcorn flick, this isn't a fluke. Some people like movies, all movies. The good and the big banging Summer ones.
{nm}
Machined2
May 31, 13:08
There's a difference between "big" and "good." Last year, "Transformers: Age of Extinction" ("big") was the worst movie I saw all summer.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:13
I don't think you understand what I'm saying. I can enjoy a "big" summer movie with low expectations and just enjoy the experience, and I'm
Machined2
May 31, 14:09
I'm okay with that too. "Die Hard" isn't the deepest film ever, but everyone loves it because it was creative. That
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 15:30
*That shows more effort was placed on characters, plot, and direction. "San Andreas" just looks like "ooo boom blam pew-pew CRASH."
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 15:32
Considering your posts here - WHY would you waste your money on Transformers - isn't that exactly what your ranting against?!?!?
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 14:25
I was on a date, and I do love to laugh at Michael Bay's incompetence. But even then, I still felt like I was hammered for 2.5 hrs straight.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 15:33
Hello? SANDR looks like a guilty pleasure. Might even watch the DVD.
{nm}
lesana
May 31, 13:09
Have you seen sharknado the movie
{nm}
mike255
May 31, 13:25
The first one I needed to drink a lot of vodka to enjoy. "Sharknado: The Second One" was an improvement, but TV still is free. Tickets ain't
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:36
Syfy's free?
{nm}
Biff68
May 31, 13:39
It's not Pay-Per-View or Video On Demand is all I mean. People would rather spend money on tickets for San Andreas than turn on the TV. Ugh.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:48
Thats why films that make you "think" seem to have limited release
{nm}
blaze223
May 31, 13:28
Get this (if you can): escapism requires distraction. Distraction's getting you to THINK about something else. Stupid movies don't. (inside)
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 13:47
But if everyone liked the movies you are insisting they should like, how would you feel superior?
{nm}
srrichardson
Jun 01, 08:57
if you liquidate i move up one spot. just throwing that out there.
{nm}
tradermark
May 31, 13:54
Secretstalker, is that you ... :-?
{nm}
JMT-NL
May 31, 14:02
it does remind me of The Great Chipmunk Rant Of 2007
{nm}
RazorHawk
May 31, 14:15
Do you have a link to that? But that's tonally so different. "San Andreas" is like "take me so seriously," but "Alvin" is like ADORABLE.
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 15:36
there is almost no access to any HSX postings that happened before this new version of the site launched in June 2009
RazorHawk
May 31, 16:09
There would certainly be a lot of useful, playable information if we could. But I remember the relaunch! I'd only played for 1.5 yrs by then
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 16:13
If you survived HSX Orange.... you can survive any upcoming disaster porn revival!
{nm}
RazorHawk
May 31, 18:24
Well that's North American box office, so there's bound to be a few Canadians in there as well. Also $50M, that's like 5M people out of 350M
casey
May 31, 14:18
That made me feel a little better. Silly Canadians--American movies are for Americans! Except for "The Wolverine," that crazy Canuck.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 15:38
lol dude mad.
{nm}
thedudeman2222
May 31, 15:34
I can't believe your so upset it was a good comedy. I found myself laughing a fair bit through the movie.
{nm}
Phillips
May 31, 15:41
Did you see the movie?
Phillips
May 31, 15:55
Some movies you don't have to see. Sometimes you really can see the trailer and have seen the entire story. Like "Cinderella." Or "Get Hard"
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 16:08
Wow, skipped that long screed, but now you know how I felt after the first Jackass movie.
{nm}
not2fast
May 31, 15:58
At least "Jackass" can be ambitious. "Hey, let's make a disaster movie where the city crumbles! Have we seen that before? Yes? Oh well! PAY"
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 16:03
Sorry, anyone that has anything remotely good to say about Jackass has no business complaining about other movies
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 17:09
If the Academy Awards honored Stuntwork, the Jackass series would've been a regular during those years. Those guys got balls (maybe no more)
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 19:15
TIL: never invite chosenone2oo5 to a party
{nm}
adrenalin112
May 31, 16:15
TIL: adrenalin112 is taking a piss. adrenalin112 hasn Also, Happy Gilmore and Top Gun both suck incredibly bad.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 16:20
I hate this keyboard, I keep hitting some random key with my pinky and it's submitting my posts. Was saying TIL: adrenalin112 hasn't been--
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 16:22
well i had to give you a 1 year head start to make it fair ;D
{nm}
adrenalin112
May 31, 16:37
TIL: adrenalin112 thinks 4 months = 1 year.
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 16:55
The Towering Inferno...Poseidon Adventure...Earthquake...and a little James Bond...mix em up and you get SANDR. Sometimes
StarBondFund
May 31, 19:05
I would never rank Denzel that high. It doesn't need to be "San Andreas" starring Peter O'Toole. It just shouldn't be arbitrary/derivative.
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 19:17
lol. I agree with. America deserves the Cinema they get
{nm}
Juiced
May 31, 19:24
Yes, but what does it NEED...? You set me up for The Dark Knight quote. It's the film America deserves...but not the one it needs...
{nm}
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 19:35
Wow - and there we have a big difference of opinion. I wasn't impressed AT ALL. and it was derivative and boring
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 20:26
On my gosh we agree. Just look at the foreign box office. Chosenone that's who you should be arguing with
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 20:28
this should have been under tristafe (aka professor smartbrain) post below
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 20:31
you are under the misimpression that Hollywood is making these movies for America anymore
tristafé
May 31, 20:00
Agreed. There's far more reliance on the international box office.
{nm}
~JPV~
May 31, 20:31
I'm not under a misimpression here. But international comes down to 1. stars and 2. brand franchises. But we all know (click inside)
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 20:43
You're underestimating foreign gross. There are now 32 movies over 600mil foreign BO, 17 over 700. Last Ice Age only 18% domestic BO
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 21:07
damn - put it in the wrong place again - goes below - but I think foreign seems to be more action instead of stars
{nm}
JDolphin
May 31, 21:09
Underestimate, overestimate, over-under...studios make movies for a global audience, but the screenwriters? Directors? Actors? (inside)
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 22:58
Hey chosenone: Great post. You really got it rockin in here today. Nicely done.
{nm}
goodvibe61
May 31, 20:43
^This. "They see me trollin'...they hatin'..." I'm glad a lot of you could contribute your opinions! I have an improved perspective on it.
chosenone2oo5
May 31, 20:47
Great thread. Good fun, thanks for posting
{nm}
ryeontherocks
May 31, 21:10